Oct. 27 2016

Pollution Exposure is Higher in City Kids Who Are Active

Increased exposure to pollutants may offset health benefits of regular exercise

Children from urban areas of New York City who engaged in vigorous daily exercise had greater exposure to black carbon, a traffic-related pollutant, than children who were less active, according to a study by a multidisciplinary team of researchers from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health and the College of Physicians & Surgeons. The researchers also found that while physically active children had reduced airway inflammation compared to less active children, this association was offset by having high black carbon exposure. Findings from the study were published online in the journal Environmental Research.

Black carbon, a pollutant that is also an indicator of diesel exhaust exposure, is known to have an adverse impact on health. However, little research has examined whether children living in urban areas receive a higher dose of the pollutant when they engage in regular physical activity.

“There are numerous health benefits associated with regular physical activity, particularly for children,” says Stephanie Lovinsky-Desir, MD, assistant professor of pediatrics at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) and lead author of the study. “We wanted to determine if regular exercise increases the risk of exposure to air pollution in city children and if that exposure has an impact on the lungs.”

The researchers studied 129 children (age 9 to 14 years) from the Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health longitudinal birth cohort, which is composed of children of African American and Dominican heritage living in the Bronx and Northern Manhattan.
The participants wore wrist motion detectors to measure their physical activity over a period of six days. Nearly 60 percent of the children were considered active, engaging in 60 minutes or more of moderate to vigorous activity per day, per recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Those who obtained less exercise were characterized as nonactive.

Personal exposure to black carbon was monitored during two 24-hour periods, at the beginning and the end of the physical activity assessment, with a wearable vest containing a miniature black carbon-detection device. Following each 24-hour black carbon collection period, the researchers measured each child’s level of fractional exhaled nitric oxide, a marker of airway inflammation. They also measured each child’s specific sensitivity to indoor and outdoor allergens.

The study revealed that the active children were exposed to 25 percent greater concentration of black carbon compared with nonactive children. Daily physical activity was associated with reduced airway inflammation, but that effect primarily occurred among the children who were exposed to lower concentrations of black carbon. Exercise had no effect on airway inflammation among children exposed to the highest concentrations of black carbon.

“This study’s findings clearly add to evidence that physical activity may benefit the respiratory health of children, but exposure to high levels of black carbon may lessen this effect,” said Rachel Miller, MD, professor of Environmental Health Sciences at the Mailman School of Public Health and professor of Medicine (in pediatrics) at CUMC. “Future studies should be aimed at understanding the precise levels of pollutant exposure during periods of high activity so that we might better understand which children are at the highest risk for lung disease.”

The study is titled, “Physical Activity, Black Carbon Exposure, and Airway Inflammation in an Urban Adolescent Cohort.” Authors were Stephanie Lovinsky-Desir, Columbia University Medical Center, Kyung Hwa Jung (CUMC), Andrew G. Rundle (Columbia’s Mailman School of Public Health), Lori A. Hoepner (Mailman), Joshua B. Bautista (CUMC), Frederica P. Perera (Mailman), Steven N. Chillrud (Columbia University), Matthew S. Perzanowski (Mailman), and Rachel L. Miller (Mailman and CUMC).

The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (3R01ES013163, 2R01ES13163,5P01ES09600/EPA RD-83214101, P30ES009089, and KL2TR00008) and the Stony Wold-Herbert Fund.